— title: “I Tried GROW Coaching in My 1:1s. It Cut Them in Half.” date: 2026-06-15 blog: SH status: draft needs_review: true approved: 2026-06-15 series: leadership-2 category: leadership tags: [leadership, coaching, engineering-management, 1-on-1, grow-model] wp_slug: grow-coaching-cycle-1on1-leadership meta_description: “I added the GROW coaching model to my 1:1s. The meetings got shorter, the team unblocked themselves, and I finally stopped solving their problems for them.” internal_links: – teaching-ai-like-junior-dev-leadership-4-communication – delegation-failures-5-things-i-stopped-doing-as-a-lead – design-thinking-is-80-percent-theater —
I Tried GROW Coaching in My 1:1s. It Cut Them in Half.
Last week I ran a 1:1 that lasted 12 minutes. The engineer walked out unblocked, with a clear next step, and didn’t ping me for the rest of the day. A month ago, the same engineer would have walked out of a 45-minute 1:1 with a vague “I’ll think about it” and pinged me twice before lunch.
The only thing I changed was the questions I asked. I stopped solving problems in the meeting. I started running them through a 30-year-old coaching framework called GROW — Goal, Reality, Options, Way Forward.
The 1:1 That Triggered the Switch
An engineer — let’s call her Rina — came to a 1:1 with a bug she’d chased for two days. I listened, drew a diagram, proposed three solutions. We picked one. She left. 47 minutes gone.
Two days later she pinged me. The solution we picked didn’t work either. I had spent 47 minutes solving my version of her problem, and we were back to square one.
The issue wasn’t technical. I was using the 1:1 as a consulting session when it should have been coaching. A consultant gives answers. A coach asks questions. I was giving answers Rina didn’t need me to give.
GROW: Four Questions, In Order
1. Goal — "What Do You Actually Want?"
Engineers open with a problem, not a goal. “The build is slow” is a situation. The goal is the outcome they want. When I asked Rina “If we fixed this in 30 minutes, what would that let you do?”, she said: “Ship the new dashboard by Friday without burning my weekend.” That’s a real goal — and only one path to it is “fix the bug today.”
2. Reality — "Where Are You Now, Really?"
The temptation is to skip from “I want X” to “here’s how.” Without a clear current state, the options you generate are fantasies. Rina had tried the docs, a Stack Overflow fix (wrong data shape), a manual workaround (didn’t scale), and a vendor ticket (pending). Her mental model was correct — she was at a dead end, not in a maze.
3. Options — "What Could You Do?"
She generated five: wait for the vendor, roll back the buggy change, write a custom workaround, pair with a teammate to find the root cause, or cut the affected feature from this release. I had a strong preference. I kept it to myself.
4. Way Forward — "What Will You Do, by When?"
Rina picked pairing with a teammate. She asked me one thing: sign-off to ship the workaround if pairing didn’t surface a fix by Thursday. I said yes. Total time: 14 minutes.
Three traps I kept falling into: skipping Reality to jump into solutions, judging options mid-brainstorm (kills the flow), and re-absorbing ownership at the end (“well, what I’d do is…”). The fix for all three is the same — ask the next GROW question, don’t give the answer.
What Changed After Four Weeks
My 1:1s dropped from 45 minutes to 15. I stopped solving problems in the meeting. The engineer picked the solution, not me. The engineer owned the follow-up, not me. I got about 8 hours a week back.
Try It in Your Next 1:1
Ask exactly four questions: 1. “What do you actually want?” — push past the first answer 2. “Where are you now, really?” — stay silent until they’re done 3. “What could you do?” — write everything down, no judgment 4. “What will you do, by when?” — confirm what they need from you
Run four 1:1s before you judge it. The first will feel awkward. The third will produce a decision the engineer owns. The fourth will be the moment you stop wanting to go back.
If the person can’t even name the goal, that’s a different framework — I’ll write about that one next.
—
Have you tried GROW in your 1:1s? Drop a comment with the messy version. Or read the previous post in this leadership series.
—
===DEVTO===
GROW Coaching Cut My 1:1s in Half
I ran a 1:1 that lasted 47 minutes. The engineer walked out with a “plan” that fell apart in 2 days. I had spent my week solving her problem instead of coaching her through it.
The fix was a 30-year-old coaching framework called GROW: Goal, Reality, Options, Way Forward.
Four weeks in, my 1:1s dropped from 45 minutes to 15. The team unblocks themselves. I have 8 hours a week back.
If you want to test this, run four 1:1s in the format before judging it. The first will feel awkward. The fourth will be the moment you stop wanting to go back.
Read the full breakdown on Susiloharjo.
Discover more from Susiloharjo
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.